Treatments & Surgery · Comparison

Four ways to resurface a knee, honestly compared

What each procedure actually is, who it suits, and what the follow-up data says — so you can walk into the consult with better questions.

Microfracture

the old default

What it is
Awl punctures the bone to bleed marrow into the defect; forms fibrocartilage.
Best suited to
Small defects (<2 cm²), lower demand patients.
Evidence
STRONGworks early, but deterioration is documented from ~18 months and failure reaches ~38% at 10 years
Recovery
6–9 months; strict early protection.
Ask your surgeon
What happens when fibrocartilage wears?

MACI

cultured chondrocytes

What it is
Your own chondrocytes grown on a membrane, implanted in a second surgery.
Best suited to
Larger defects in younger, active knees (the SUMMIT trial enrolled ≥3 cm²).
Evidence
STRONGbeats microfracture at 2 and 5 years
Recovery
9–12+ months; two operations.
Ask your surgeon
How many have you done, at what defect size?

ICC / CEMTRO Cell

high-density MACI

What it is
Same idea, far higher cell density per cm² — the Madrid group's refinement.
Best suited to
Similar range; marketed for higher-grade repair tissue.
Evidence
PROM.case series, all single-center; published follow-up stops at 24 months
Recovery
Comparable to MACI.
Ask your surgeon
Where's the published follow-up?

Agili-C

aragonite scaffold

What it is
Cell-free coral-derived plug the body remodels into cartilage and bone.
Best suited to
Osteochondral defects, incl. some knees with mild OA.
Evidence
PROM.RCT superiority held at 5 years, but implant failures doubled (7% → 15%) between years 2 and 5
Recovery
Single surgery; 6–12 months.
Ask your surgeon
Am I inside the studied indication?

1 of 4, Microfracture

Full entries: Microfracture · MACI · ICC / CEMTRO Cell · Agili-C