← Study Library
Cohort · 2010 · n=36
Preclinicalcounts toward this tierArthroscopy vs. MRI for a detailed assessment of cartilage disease in osteoarthritis: diagnostic value of MRI in clinical practice
von Engelhardt LV, Lahner M, Klussmann A, Bouillon B, et al. · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Preclinicalcounts toward this tier
Agreement between MRI and arthroscopy was moderate to good (kappa 0.50 and 0.62), worst in the patellofemoral joint and particularly at grade 3. On the common claim that MRI under-grades, the authors looked for a tendency for MRI to under-grade and report that one 'was not noticed'. MRI grading is imprecise rather than reliably biased low.
- Population
- 36 patients with clinically relevant knee osteoarthritis
- Intervention
- Standardized 1.5-T MRI graded by two blinded readers
- Comparator
- Arthroscopic grading of the same knees within three months
- Limitations
- Small (n=36), single-center, 1.5 T, and up to three months between scan and scope — long enough for real change in some knees.
Cited by
1 page cites this study. No entry does — nothing here is a treatment claim.
- Your grade: what the number means, and what it doesn't
Reference page · Where the number comes from
Cited for
Sensitivities at 1.5 T that sit well below the cartilage-specific figures, and a tendency to under-grade that "was not noticed".
Read the page →