← LibraryThe Cartilage Guide

Cohort · 2010 · n=36

Arthroscopy vs. MRI for a detailed assessment of cartilage disease in osteoarthritis: diagnostic value of MRI in clinical practice

von Engelhardt LV, Lahner M, Klussmann A, Bouillon B, et al. · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Preclinicalcounts toward this tier

Agreement between MRI and arthroscopy was only moderate to good (kappa 0.50 and 0.62), worst in the patellofemoral joint and particularly at grade 3. Directly against a common claim: the authors looked for a tendency for MRI to under-grade and report that one 'was not noticed'. MRI grading is imprecise rather than reliably biased low.

Population
36 patients with clinically relevant knee osteoarthritis
Intervention
Standardized 1.5-T MRI graded by two blinded readers
Comparator
Arthroscopic grading of the same knees within three months
Limitations
Small (n=36), single-center, 1.5 T, and up to three months between scan and scope — long enough for real change in some knees.

Cited by

No published entry cites this yet