← Study Library
Cohort · 2010 · n=36
Preclinicalcounts toward this tierArthroscopy vs. MRI for a detailed assessment of cartilage disease in osteoarthritis: diagnostic value of MRI in clinical practice
von Engelhardt LV, Lahner M, Klussmann A, Bouillon B, et al. · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Preclinicalcounts toward this tier
Agreement between MRI and arthroscopy was only moderate to good (kappa 0.50 and 0.62), worst in the patellofemoral joint and particularly at grade 3. Directly against a common claim: the authors looked for a tendency for MRI to under-grade and report that one 'was not noticed'. MRI grading is imprecise rather than reliably biased low.
- Population
- 36 patients with clinically relevant knee osteoarthritis
- Intervention
- Standardized 1.5-T MRI graded by two blinded readers
- Comparator
- Arthroscopic grading of the same knees within three months
- Limitations
- Small (n=36), single-center, 1.5 T, and up to three months between scan and scope — long enough for real change in some knees.
Cited by
No published entry cites this yet