Meta-analysis · 2010 · n=3,803
Anecdotalcounts toward this tierEffects of glucosamine, chondroitin, or placebo in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: network meta-analysis
Wandel S, Jüni P, Tendal B, et al. · BMJ
Against placebo the overall pain difference on a 10 cm scale was -0.4 cm (95% credible interval -0.7 to -0.1) for glucosamine, -0.3 cm (-0.7 to 0.0) for chondroitin and -0.5 cm (-0.9 to 0.0) for the combination: distinct from zero for the single agents, and below the prespecified 0.9 cm minimal clinically important difference for all three. Joint-space differences were -0.2 mm (-0.3 to 0.0), -0.1 mm (-0.3 to 0.1) and 0.0 mm (-0.2 to 0.2). Industry-independent trials showed effects 0.5 cm (0.1 to 0.9) smaller than sponsored ones (P=0.02 for interaction), and adverse-event and withdrawal odds ratios sat near 1.
- Population
- 10 large randomised trials (an average of at least 100 patients per arm) in knee or hip osteoarthritis, seven of them funded by manufacturers
- Intervention
- Glucosamine, chondroitin, or their combination (any formulation)
- Comparator
- Placebo
- Limitations
- Restricted to trials with an average of at least 100 patients per arm, which excludes the small positive studies by design. Stratified analyses found no interaction by glucosamine salt (P>=0.20 for interaction), and the authors state that the lack of a clinically relevant effect holds for glucosamine sulphate. Funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation; no author affiliated with or funded by a manufacturer of the agents evaluated.
Cited by
1 entry references this study
- Glucosamine ± chondroitinPROM.
Supplements → Minerals & other · key study
Evidence for that entry
Promising