← Study Library
Meta-analysis · 2017 · n=1,625
Anecdotalcounts toward this tierSubgroup analyses of the effectiveness of oral glucosamine for knee and hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis from the OA trial bank
Runhaar J, Rozendaal RM, van Middelkoop M, et al. · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Anecdotalcounts toward this tier
No significant main effect of glucosamine over placebo on WOMAC pain or function, at short or long term, and none of the predefined subgroup interactions — baseline pain severity, BMI, sex, radiographic grade, presence of inflammation — reached significance either. Across the trials and stratifications the treatment effect ran from -0.43 to 2.02 on a 0 to 100 WOMAC pain scale. All five trials were rated low risk of bias and heterogeneity was near zero, so no sensitivity analysis was needed.
- Population
- Individual patient data from 5 placebo-controlled glucosamine trials — 4 knee, 1 hip — with 815 participants on glucosamine and 810 on placebo
- Intervention
- Oral glucosamine (any preparation)
- Comparator
- Placebo
- Limitations
- Of 21 eligible trials, six shared their data and five entered the analysis — the sixth compared glucosamine against green-lipped mussel extract rather than placebo. That covers 55% of everyone randomised in the published placebo-controlled literature. Four data owners were refused permission by their sponsor, and the paper notes that the trials reporting benefit use the Rottapharm compound and were not made available.
Cited by
1 entry references this study
- Glucosamine ± chondroitinPROM.
Supplements → Minerals & other
Evidence for that entry
Promising