Meta-analysis · 2023 · n=507
Strongcounts toward this tierAnalgesic efficacy of collagen peptide in knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Lin CR, Tsai SHL, Huang KY, Tsai PA, Chou H, Chang SH · Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Pain SMD -0.58 (95% CI -0.98 to -0.18, p = 0.004) favouring collagen peptide across three trials and 375 patients, with I-squared 68%; the GRADE table states the same outcome as -0.63 (-0.86 to -0.39). Adverse-event risk did not differ (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.99-2.78, p = 0.05). The authors declare no financial, commercial or other relationships. Worth setting beside the larger trial-sequential synthesis: this independent analysis reports a bigger pain effect from three trials than the 35-trial pooled estimate does, and grades all four of them at high risk of bias.
- Population
- Four randomized controlled trials of collagen peptide in knee osteoarthritis, 507 patients in the adverse-event analysis; three trials and 375 patients carry the pain analysis
- Intervention
- Collagen peptide
- Comparator
- Placebo
- Limitations
- Only four trials and 507 patients, all four rated high risk of bias by the authors themselves; GRADE certainty moderate for pain and very low for adverse events. Moderate heterogeneity (I-squared 68%) is unexplained — no subgroup analysis by dose, duration or collagen preparation is reported. Pain only; no function or imaging endpoint.
Cited by
1 entry references this study
- How good are the collagen trials?PROM.
Supplements → Collagen & building blocks
Evidence for that entry
Promising