← Study Library
Meta-analysis · 2024 · n=2,183
Strongcounts toward this tierEfficacy and acceptability of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) for depressed patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Limveeraprajak N, Nakhawatchana S, Visukamol A, Siripakkaphant C, Suttajit S, Srisurapanont M · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Strongcounts toward this tier
SAMe alone separated from placebo on depressive symptoms (SMD -0.58, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.23, I-squared 68%). Added to an antidepressant it did not separate from placebo plus the same antidepressant (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.63 to 0.19, I-squared 76%), and set against an antidepressant alone the difference was SMD 0.06 (95% CI -0.06 to 0.18, I-squared 49%). Dropout rates did not differ in any of the three comparisons. The authors rate the certainty moderate.
- Population
- Twenty-three randomised trials, 2,183 participants, in three groups: 11 trials of SAMe against placebo, 5 of SAMe added to antidepressants, and 7 of SAMe against antidepressants alone
- Intervention
- S-adenosyl-L-methionine, alone or added to an antidepressant
- Comparator
- Placebo or an antidepressant
- Limitations
- Depression, not a joint — carried here because it is the literature most people taking SAMe are actually relying on, and it is much stronger than the osteoarthritis literature. Heterogeneity is high in two of the three comparisons. Full text was not retrievable.
Cited by
1 entry references this study
- SAMe (S-adenosylmethionine)PROM.
Supplements → Vitamins & cofactors · key study
Evidence for that entry
Promising